NJ court: Seeing pet mauled not same as kin slayed

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) – New Jersey’s Supreme Court says a loving pet might be worth more than the cost of replacing it but seeing a dog suffer a violent death is not the same as witnessing a close human relative be killed.

The court’s unanimous ruling Tuesday affirmed a lower-court ruling that awarded Joyce McDougall $5,000 for the loss of dog Angel. The Maltese-poodle mix was mauled by another dog in Morris Plains five years ago.

The lower court ruled McDougall was entitled to more than the cost of a new puppy. But it threw out her claim that she should be compensated more because she witnessed her 9-year-old pooch’s violent death.

The Supreme Court ruled emotional distress damages apply only if the person sees the traumatic death of a close human relative.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

More Safety Info:

  1. Court tosses law about false claims on medals


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Violent Weather News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.